 |
|
04:35, 07/26/10. "robots: indexing"
The big thinkers of the world have thought for sometime of Fuel Synthesis as a possible solution to our fossil fuel problems and to power its production they use electricity captured from the inside of Electrical Storms! An average lightning strike with a quick 1 megawatt pulse of power is easily able to power automobiles or other equipment, though not by electric batteries, but by using its high-voltage electricity to produce synthetic fuel. Using High-Voltage is very efficient compared to lower-voltages and also with High-Voltage the energy loss is small when the electricity travels across the transmission lines. If you were to capture enough energy from lightning strikes to produce some synthetic fuel by using capacitors with oscillators the electricity as High-Voltage can be sent for long distances over transmission lines as alternating current for the powering of a refinery. Octane and most Fuels are Hydrocarbons, of course, so their raw materials can be found easily in nature in many places. Because with Fuel powered Electricity Generators the total available amount of Power Output energy is only up to 40% of the energy needed for its required Input Power it continuously uses from its fuel supply just to keep generating, I believe generating extra electricity presently to power plug-in and other electric vehicles is inefficient and not an exceptional plan. With the obvious limitations there are on massive electric power generation today Fuel Synthesis may be one good way to power our motors and compensate for the inefficiencies of our electricity generators. By supporting Fuel Synthesis and improving on our storm energy collecting a Controlled High-Voltage System could be something we could use today and might also increase our electric reserves by a possible 2x. With High-Voltage strong bonds can be made in chemicals and it will also produce quality synthetic fuels super efficiently, during fuel combustion these bonds brake apart releasing their contained power in the form of heat and expanding gasses. Amazingly, an almost perfect transfer of the captured energy from lightning strikes can be obtained by using synthetic petroleum which works with standard internal combustion engines. With Fuel Synthesis there's efficient energy transfer and the energy from lightning strikes can be almost completely output to a vehicles wheels with the produced synthetic fuel. The amount of energy in an average lightning strike can be shown with some simple calculations: (250kW/hrs. / 35kW/hrs. = 7.14 cars/hr.) A typical vehicle will use around 35kW/hrs. when traveling the speed limit on a Freeway which means 7+ vehicles can be powered for 1 hour from 1 average 250kW/hrs. lightning strike by using Fuel Synthesis. The energy discharged from big Cumulus Cloud storm systems adds up very quickly! The most ingenious thing about Fuel Synthesis is; you can use fuel produced this way, instead of steam, to generate electricity and it's almost like NUCLEAR ENERGY generating it and Fuel Synthesis will keep producing fuel for you whenever there are spare ions being transported on the electric power grid. To harness the power of synthetic fuel production though Hydrogen, Nitrogen, Oxygen and Carbon are needed. What could be more Carbon rich than Coal? Well, Coal is where the story gets interesting. If using a train load of Coal for Fuel Synthesis as the produced synthetic fuel generates electricity by removing the Carbon from the power plants exhaust, and then using the Carbon a second time again for Fuel Synthesis, the process will give you clean power FREE because there's multiple energy purposes for the Coal's Carbon! To obtain the Hydrogen and Oxygen all you need is water so some sort of natural water source like a river is needed. Put the water, Carbon, and Nitrogen from air and the needed extra ions together with a CATALYST and you can produce Fuel Synthesis using the power from an electric storm. This is Ingenious, and we think so! - The above is an Artists Rendition. - ISN'T THIS NICE TO KNOW! and, will we ever use: "Electric Powered Vehicles?" - - Robert A. Steiner. - -
-
|
